BeautySleep Dream Weaver Review

In This Review
Performance Tests | Firmness | Support & Sleeping Positions | Design | Materials | Comparisons | FAQs

At NapLab, we put each mattress to the test.

We test 10 different factors that impact the performance, comfort, and feel of the mattress. We then take the results of those tests and compare them to every mattress we’ve tested to date.

Check out the full performance table below to see how this mattress ranks:

Factor	BeautySleep Dream Weaver	Average
Overall Score	7.83	8.52
Price (Queen)	$399	$938 (Coil only)
Cooling – Score	7.0	8.6
Sinkage – Depth	2.02″	2.25″
Sinkage – Feel	Moderate	Moderate
Motion Transfer – Score	7.6	8.2
Motion Transfer – Acceleration	10.42 m/s²	8.84 m/s²
Response Time – Score	9.8	8.8
Response Time – Mostly Recovered	0.2 sec.	0.4 sec.
Response Time – Fully Recovered	0.5 sec.	1.0 sec.
Bounce – Height	10.61″	8.73″
Bounce – Feel	High	Moderate
Edge Support – Score	10	8.7
Edge Support – Sitting	2.00″	3.90″
Edge Support – Lying	Outstanding	Good
Sex – Score	9.0	8.2
Pressure Relief – Score	6.0	8.6
Comfort Layer Thickness	2.50″	4.32″
Mattress Thickness	11.50″	12.23″
Off-Gassing – Score	6.1	8.0
Off-Gassing – Smell	Strong	Strong
Off-Gassing – Days	14 days	7 days
Company – Score	9.0	8.8
Trial	100 nights	186 nights
Warranty	10 years	40% have lifetime warranties, average of other 60% of mattresses is 13 years

How is BeautySleep Dream Weaver Different?

The BeautySleep Dream Weaver is an 11.50″ coil mattress with an overall performance level that is significantly below the average, but a price that is also significantly below average. You’re really getting what you pay for with the Dream Weaver, and the result is a low-priced, low-performing mattress.

Advantages

Aside from the low price, other advantages of the Dream Weaver include fast material response time, better-than-average edge support, and a better sex score as well.

The coil construction of this mattress is really helping Dream Weaver’s score in these areas.

Neutral Factors

This mattress has moderate sinkage and a high level of bounce, with a slight degree of contour. These factors are considered “neutral” since different sleepers will have different preferences in these areas.

Disadvantages

Disadvantages of the BeautySleep include worse cooling performance, higher levels of motion transfer, and a below-average pressure relief score.

This mattress contains only 2.5″ of comfort material, which contributes to the inadequate pressure relief. Overall, this type of feel and level of support would not be ideal for side sleepers.

The BeautySleep Dream Weaver has fair cooling. During our tests, I felt a slight to moderate level of heat retention around my body.

This mattress uses a more traditional innerspring, coil type design with an 8.0” coil unit topped with 2.5” of poly foam layers. While poly foam is typically breathable and a tall coil unit brings ample airflow into the mattress, we still measured higher than average surface level temperatures.

Seemingly, these foam layers, in combination with the cover, just don’t seem to breathe especially well. The fabric on the cover feels quite rough, thick, and coarse. In my view, this particular type of fabric and cover is preventing air from easily passing in and out of the mattress, limiting breathability.

• Baseline Temperature – the temperature of the mattress before anyone lies on it
• Maximum Temperature (0 minute) – the temperature of the mattress after lying on it for 15 minutes
• Ending Temperature (5 minute) – the temperature of the mattress after being lied upon and having no one on it for 5 minutes

According to the product page, this mattress uses “AirCool” foam. In my assessment of the foams they look like fairly basic, lower spec poly foams. There is nothing that appears to be especially cool or breathable about the foams used within this mattress.

In our objective temperature tests, we measured a max surface level temperature of 91.7° F. This is 1.6° warmer than the average of 90.1° F, based on all of our tests to date. After getting off the mattress, the temperature declined by 5.3 degrees from minutes 0 to 1, which is 0.6 degrees warmer than the average 0 to 1 minute decline of 4.7 degrees.

When we consider the combination of objective data, my subjective experiences, and an analysis of the materials, I’m confident in my view that cooling is fair.

The BeautySleep Dream Weaver has moderate sinkage. During our tests, we measured a pressure point sinkage depth of 2.02″. This is 0.23″ less sinkage than the average sinkage depth of 2.25″, based on all of our tests to date.

The level of sinkage is documented in the image below.

The mattress creates a slight body contouring hug. The combination of a slight hug and more restrained sinkage depth creates more of a floating feel for sleepers.

Instead of lying down “in” the mattress, the body lies more “on” the mattress. Ultimately, this mattress has a more classic coil mattress feel. While it uses 2.5” of poly foam comfort layers, those layers don’t hug or contour the body significantly; we have more of a floating feel, and there is a more restrained level of sinkage.

This feel is neither good nor bad, but it is a specific feel. To be comfortable on this mattress, you’ll need to prefer the more traditional innerspring mattress feel, while also preferring more firmness, less sinkage, and less body hug.

The BeautySleep Dream Weaver has a moderate level of motion transfer. During our tests, we measured a total acceleration range of 10.42 m/s². This is 18% more motion transfer than the average of 8.83 m/s².

Innerspring mattresses typically create more motion transfer, and that’s exactly what we measured here as well. The combination of a higher-than-average level of bounce, firm feel, and thinner-than-average comfort layer all work together to set the stage for more energy transfer and higher motion.

The level of motion transfer is also documented in the video below.

In our motion transfer chart, which visualizes our accelerometer data, we can see the highest motion peaks from 0 to 0.2 seconds. Motion declines thereafter, but we still see a notable secondary motion spike from 0.6 to 0.7 seconds.

By 1.23 seconds, we’ve returned to near-zero levels of energy, which is 0.34 seconds longer than the average motion duration of 0.89 seconds.

In our tests, we found that both motion intensity and motion duration were worse than average. As a result, the total motion transfer experience on the mattress is significantly worse than average.

The BeautySleep Dream Weaver has an extremely fast mostly recovered response time and a very fast fully recovered response time.

In our mostly recovered test, we measured a recovery speed of 0.2 seconds, which is 0.21 seconds faster than the average of 0.41 seconds, based on all of our tests to date. In our fully recovered responsiveness test, we measured a recovery speed of 0.5 seconds, which is 0.52 seconds faster than the average of 1.02 seconds.

In most cases, it is foam layers that slow the material recovery speed, especially memory foam. This mattress has only 2.5” of foam, which is considerably thinner than average. In addition, the foams are all poly foam, no memory foam.

The level of responsiveness is documented in the video below.

As a result, there just isn’t much that can prevent this mattress from recovering back to its original shape quickly.

The innerspring coil unit and poly foam layers both rebound back to shape fast. The faster recovery speed ensures that ease of movement is excellent, and you’ll never experience a stuck feeling on the mattress.

The BeautySleep Dream Weaver has a high level of bounce. During our tests, we measured a total bounce height of 10.61″. This is 1.87″ more bounce than the average of 8.74″, based on all of our tests to date.

Innerspring mattresses typically create more bounce than average and that’s exactly what we measured here. Just as with response, it is typically foam layers that have a suppressive effect on bounce. When there is less foam, there is simply less material that can reduce bounce.

The level of bounce is also documented in the video below.

The Dream Weaver only contains 2.5” of foam layers, and those foams are highly responsive and springy. As such, they work alongside the coil layer to deliver a higher-than-average level of bounce.

The increased bounce height is beneficial for ease of movement and sex performance. However, it’s also a major reason why motion transfer is worse than average.

The BeautySleep Dream Weaver has outstanding sitting edge support and outstanding lying edge support.

In our sitting edge support test, we measured a sitting sinkage compression of 2.00″. This is 1.90″ less sitting sinkage than the average of 3.90″, based on all of our tests to date.

The level of edge support while seated is documented in the images below.

While lying directly on the edge of the mattress, I felt that the support was outstanding in all sleeping positions. This mattress has a firm feel and moderate, bordering on minimal, sinkage depth. In addition, this mattress is equipped with a full perimeter reinforced edge support foam.

The level of edge support while lying is documented in the images below.

This combination of design and feel factors is working together to deliver an incredibly robust level of edge support for both sitting and lying. Overall, I’m impressed with the edge support performance and expect it will be more than satisfactory for most sleepers.

The BeautySleep Dream Weaver has excellent sex performance. On the positive side, edge support is outstanding.

With just 2.00” of sitting edge sinkage, the edge is incredibly robust and supportive, extending the usable part of the mattress. In addition, bounce earned an excellent score due to 10.61” of total bounce height. When it comes to sex, more bounce is almost always better.

Sex Factor	Factor Weight	Score	Rating
Bounce	65%	9.1	Very High
Edge Support	20%	10	Outstanding
Noise	5%	8.0	Moderate
Pressure Relief	5%	6.0	Mediocre
Cooling	5%	7.0	Fair

Higher bounce makes the mattress less strenuous, less tiring, and more fun for sex. Moving on with middling performance, we have noise, which we rated at a moderate level. The limited foam layer and coil design simply means this mattress makes a bit more noise than is ideal.

Lastly, we have pressure relief and cooling, both of which earned less-than-great scores. Even so, because bounce and edge support were such strong performers, the total sex performance on the mattress is still excellent.

The BeautySleep Dream Weaver has a mediocre level of pressure relief. During our tests, I felt notable pressure points on my body and, in general, found the mattress to be uncomfortable.

The mattress is equipped with 2.5″ of comfort material, which is 1.81″ less comfort material than the average comfort layer thickness of 4.31″, based on all of our tests to date. The comfort dynamic on this mattress struggles in a number of ways. Let’s start with the material quality.

In all NapLab mattress tests, we make it a point to cut the mattress open and examine the material quality. In doing so, I found the foam layers look and feel incredibly low quality, both on the body and in-hand.

The foams have a notably crunchy sound when you run a finger across them. Based on my years of testing, I’ve routinely seen crunchier foams like this feel bad, provide less comfort, and perform worse. In addition to the foam quality issues, the mattress creates a more polarizing comfort dynamic.

We have a combination of a firm feel, less sinkage, a classic coil type feel, very little foam, and what little foam there is doesn’t feel great on the body. Individually, these attributes aren’t necessarily a problem.

However, together they create a polarizing feel that I found incredibly uncomfortable and failed to alleviate pressure points on my body.

Pressure Relief (PSI)	Average	Maximum
Side Sleepers	0.10	0.27

Pressure Relief (PSI)	Average	Maximum
Back Sleepers	0.07	0.44

Pressure Relief (PSI)	Average	Maximum
Stomach Sleepers	0.06	0.29

When I consider our objective pressure mapping tests, material thickness, material quality, and my subjective experience on the mattress, I’m confident most sleepers will find the pressure relief to be mediocre.

The BeautySleep Dream Weaver had a strong smell upon the initial arrival. The mattress smelled for 14 days. This is 6.7 days longer than the average smell duration of 7.3 days.

BeautySleep mattresses come with a 100-night trial period and a 10-year warranty. Shipping and returns are both free.

Company Factor	Factor Weight	Score	Data
Returns	40%	10	$0
Trial Period	30%	8.0	100 nights
Warranty	20%	8.0	10 years
Shipping	10%	10	$0
Country of Origin	0%		USA

Comparing 110+ brands tested to date, the average trial period is 180 nights, 80 nights more than BeautySleep offers.

The average warranty is 13 years, which is 3 years more than this mattress, and that’s if we exclude the 41% of mattresses that offer lifetime warranties.

The BeautySleep Dream Weaver is available in 4 different firmness levels and 3 different cover types that increase in thickness. These firmness options are Ultra Plush, Plush, Medium, and Firm.

Exact firmnesses range from 4 – 8 out of 10 on the firmness scale. Additionally, there is a range of mattress types and thicknesses within the Dream Weaver collection.

Some Dream Weaver mattresses are innerspring (coil), while others are hybrids. Cover types include Pillow Top, Euro Top, and Quilted

The table below details exactly which mattresses are offered at which firmness.

Thickness	Ultra Plush (4 out of 10)	Plush (5 out of 10)	Medium (6 out of 10)	Firm (8 out of 10)
Under 12″ Thick	N/A	N/A	11.5″ Hybrid; Quilted Cover	11.5″ Coil ; Quilted Cover
12 – 13″ Thick	N/A	12.5″ Hybrid; Quilted Cover	12.25″ Coil; Quilted Cover	12.5″ Coil ; Quilted Cover
13 – 14″ Thick	N/A	13.75″ Coil; Quilted Cover	N/A	N/A
Over 14″ Thick	14.25″ Coil; Pillow Top	N/A	14.25″ Coil; Pillow Top	N/A

We tested the 11.5” firm version, which is marketed as an innerspring. This model is a firm feel, 8 out of 10 firmness.

Based on the materials and my experience with the firm version, I would estimate the Medium version to have a medium-firm feel (6 out of 10 on our firmness scale).

The Plush version will likely have a medium feel, 5 out of 10 on our firmness scale and the Ultra Plush would be a 4 out of 10, with a soft feel.

Support on the BeautySleep Dream Weaver is mediocre. During our tests, I felt that support was lacking significantly.

For a mattress to create ideal support, it must both keep the spine in a neutral alignment while also providing sufficient pressure relief. The Dream Weaver failed to fully achieve either of these requirements, in my view.

Support Factor	Data
Comfort Layer	2.50″
Support Layer	9.00″
Firmness	Soft, Medium, Medium-Firm, and Firm
Body Contour	Slight
Zoned Support	No
Reinforced Edge	Yes

With respect to spinal alignment, I felt that the mattress was so firm and created so much pushback that my spine was never able to reach a neutral position. As a result, the mattress created more pressure point issues along the body.

Moreover, the lack of a sufficiently thick foam layer and foams that, in my view, aren’t especially high quality, creates a complete lack of comfort on the mattress. More simply put, I did not ever feel comfortable lying on this mattress.

Check out the table below to see the sleeper weights and sleeping positions that would be best suited for this mattress.

Sleeper Weight	Stomach Sleeper	Side Sleeper	Back Sleeper
Under 150 lbs.	Maybe	No	Maybe
150-250 lbs.	Maybe	No	Maybe
250-300 lbs.	Maybe	No	Maybe

The mattress is equipped with a 9.0″ support layer. This is 1.09″ thicker than the average support layer thickness of 7.91″, based on all of our tests to date. The version of the Dream Weaver we tested is the 11.5” firm version.

It’s possible that this mattress simply has a more polarizing feel due to the design, height, and firmness. And perhaps other versions of this mattress would create better comfort and support. At least with respect to this specific version, it’s really only suited for sleepers who prefer a firm feel, don’t need robust pressure relief, and also prefer a coil mattress feel.

For most sleepers, I would strongly advise going with a different version of the Dream Weaver, specifically one of the models offered in a medium firmness level, which is going to better meet the needs of most sleepers.

Based on all of my tests to date, an analysis of the materials, and my subjective experiences, I’m confident that most sleepers will find support on the BeautySleep Dream Weaver to be mediocre.

The BeautySleep Dream Weaver is an 11.50″ coil mattress that comes in four firmness options—Soft, Medium, Medium-Firm, and Firm, and a few different thicknesses. As I mentioned above, I tested the 11.5″ firm version.

Design Factor	Data
Type	Coil
Thickness	11.50″
Cover Type	Quilted
Weight	68.81 lbs.
Has Handles	No
Fiberglass-Free	Yes
Ships in a Box	No

The BeautySleep Dream Weaver is 11.50″ thick and contains a combination of foam and coils. From top to bottom, here is a full list of the materials used in this mattress:

Layer Type	Thickness	Layer Specs
Quilted Cover	1.50″	Not Available
Poly Foam	1.00″	Not Available
Pocketed Coils	8.00″	Not Available
Support Foam	1.00″	Not Available

The BeautySleep Dream Weaver has a 1.5″ quilted cover. It is soft and has an organic stitching pattern, as shown below.

I mentioned above, but I’ll also mention here, there are versions of the Dream Weaver that have a thicker pillow top or Euro cover.

These types of covers can also provide deeper sinkage, especially when paired with a softer firmness than the firm version we tested.

The comfort layer is 2.50″ thick, if we include the 1.5″ quilted cover. But below the cover, there is only one foam layer, a 1.0″ poly foam.

Without even discussing anything about the foam quality, I can say outright that this is significantly thinner than average. The average comfort layer is 4.3″ thick, 42% thicker than what we measured on the Dream Weaver.

Had this layer been thicker, it’s likely that we would have seen better pressure relief or better performance.

The support layer is 9.00″ thick and made of an 8.0″ pocketed coil system followed by a 1.0″ support foam base.

This layer is pretty standard for a coil mattress and looks and feels sufficiently supportive.

Product Evolution

BeautySleep is a sub-brand under the Serta Simmons name, right alongside Beautyrest. BeautySleep is designed as an entry-level priced brand.

Higher-tier mattresses fall under the Beautyrest name. From Serta Simmons, there is nearly a century of mattresses being released, discontinued, and reengineered.

While I don’t have an exact launch date, the BeautySleep Dream Weaver appears to have launched in the Summer of 2024. There are many sub-versions of the BeautySleep Dream Weaver mattress, so it’s difficult to trace back the exact origins of this specific model.

Other Mattresses to Consider

Not sure if the BeautySleep Dream Weaver is the right pick for you? Check out these three other top-rated coil mattresses for alternatives you may want to consider.

Frequently Asked Questions

Still have questions? Check out some of the top FAQs on the BeautySleep Dream Weaver mattress below and get the answers you’re looking for.